Is there no glass? Or is/was the rent fabric acting as the window? And if so, would it indeed have been identified as a "window", or simply a window covering?
No glass. If there were glass and the glass were broken and missing pieces wouldn't it be a broken window? I suppose that if the fabric is a window covering then the glass would also be a window covering. Then broken or torn would refer to the window frame. But then again if we have a window frame then it suggest that it is framing the window which brings us back to the glass and the fabric being window. The early colonists used parchment in their windows. Ah well...
4 comments:
A torn window?
Is the window not torn?
Is there no glass? Or is/was the rent fabric acting as the window? And if so, would it indeed have been identified as a "window", or simply a window covering?
No glass. If there were glass and the glass were broken and missing pieces wouldn't it be a broken window? I suppose that if the fabric is a window covering then the glass would also be a window covering. Then broken or torn would refer to the window frame. But then again if we have a window frame then it suggest that it is framing the window which brings us back to the glass and the fabric being window. The early colonists used parchment in their windows. Ah well...
Post a Comment